https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93731
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > These systems are EOL so we can't expect any fixes to the systems themselves. > > The question is "is the latest imported as an version even supposed to > support 10.7"? > > I have a patch to unsupport the sanitiser for <= 10.6 [where it has been > unsupported upstream since at least the last release]. That is something > that I can apply immediately. > > If the latest sanitiser code is _supposed_ to work on 10.7 - we should at > least take a cursory look at why/where it's failing before punting. > > I agree that spending much time on making the sanitisers work on EOL > machines is not a priority. I don't have access to my 10.7 box right now - > but will take a look next week. I'm on 10.6 and have been configuring with --disable-libsanitizer for some time now anyways, so it won't be too much of a loss if that becomes the default
