https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90951
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c51ac41714469104ee6120db3eedfb0964290502 commit r9-8292-gc51ac41714469104ee6120db3eedfb0964290502 Author: Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Wed Feb 26 13:03:23 2020 -0500 c++: Fix constexpr vs. omitted aggregate init. Value-initialization is importantly different from {}-initialization for this testcase, where the former calls the deleted S constructor and the latter initializes S happily. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2020-02-26 Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/90951 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_array_reference): {}-initialize missing elements instead of value-initializing them.
