https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90311
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[9/10 Regression] wrong |[9 Regression] wrong code
|code with -O and |with -O and
|__builtin_add_overflow() |__builtin_add_overflow()
|and compare |and compare
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 64-bit arithmetic code for Arm was completely rewritten for gcc-10, so this
testcase no-longer fails.
However, it's a 10(ish)-patch series (and maybe some follow-ups); I'm not sure
if a back port is appropriate.
