https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94067
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
commit r10-7094-g81fa6d7321dd9b645d86de4a8a6967c603f176e3
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Mar 9 21:52:18 2020 +0100
c++: Readd [LR]ROTATE_EXPR support to constexpr.c [PR94067]
Since r10-6527-gaaa26bf496a646778ac861aed124d960b5bf549f fold_for_warn
will perform maybe_constant_value even on some cp_fold produced trees and
so can include rotate exprs which were removed last fall from constexpr.c
2020-03-09 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/94067
Revert
2019-10-11 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Do not handle
RROTATE_EXPR and LROTATE_EXPR.
* g++.dg/warn/Wconversion-pr94067.C: New test.
