https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94290
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This is a test bug. Please see https://www.openmp.org/spec-html/5.0/openmpse22.html#x116-4340002.14 When you have a combined or composite constructs, clauses that apply to just one of the constructs generally are applied to the construct which allows them, while clauses that can be applied to multiple constructs have more complicated clause distribution rules in that section. When you have combined !$omp target teams default(firstprivate) map(from:a) then the default clause, as it applies to teams only and not target, goes to teams, and map clauses go to target. So, it is like !$omp target map(from:a) !$omp teams default(firstprivate) Now, if you reference a in the teams region, there is no data sharing clause on the teams construct for a, and the default is firstprivate, which means an implicit firstprivate(a) clause is added to the teams construct. The target construct has a map clause, so a on that construct is mapped rather than privatized, which means that each team will have its own privatized copy of a, and the uninitialized original mapped a is then copied back. Either don't use default(firstprivate) on the combined constructs because you really want sharing for those vars, or you can use !$omp target teams default(firstprivate) map(from:a) shared(a) While OpenMP has a restriction that the same list item can't be specified in mapping and data sharing clauses, my understanding is that this applies after the clauses are distributed among the constituent constructs, and as target construct doesn't allow shared clause and teams construct doesn't allow map clause, each goes to one of them and should do what you want. Adding shared(a, b, c, d) clause to both combined directives in your testcase fixes it. You can even just add shared(d), though in that case the a, b, c arrays are mapped to the device and then copied from that to each of the teams private copies.