https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94535
--- Comment #10 from Alisdair Meredith <alisdairm at me dot com> --- And double-checking the C++ Standard again, I think I have wording in favor of my report and contradicting the recommended best practice for the pending C standard: [cpp.line]p2 "The line number of the current source line is one greater than the number of new-line characters read or introduced in translation phase 1 (5.2) while processing the source file to the current token." We will not start interpreting the tokens for macro expansion until after seeing the closing paren for the invocation, which means counting all the newlines up to the closing paren, and so reporting the higher line number. The joys of a shared pre-processor specification.
