https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94711

            Bug ID: 94711
           Summary: [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed
                    incorrectly with -std=c++17 on arm
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
          Severity: blocker
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org,
                    matmal01 at gcc dot gnu.org, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
                    rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org, redi at gcc dot gnu.org,
                    rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
        Depends on: 94383
            Blocks: 94704, 94706, 94707
  Target Milestone: ---
            Target: aarch64-*-linux

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #94383 +++

The same issue applies to 32-bit ARM too.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94383
[Bug 94383] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with
-std=c++17 on aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94704
[Bug 94704] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with
-std=c++17 on s390x/s390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94706
[Bug 94706] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with
-std=c++17 on ia64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94707
[Bug 94707] [8/9/10 Regression] class with empty base passed incorrectly with
-std=c++17 on powerpc64le

Reply via email to