https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94675

--- Comment #16 from Xavier <chantry.xavier at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #14)
> That said and codegen improvements aside, I think the submitted test case is
> sufficiently tricky that I don't see issuing a warning for it as a problem. 
> All flow-based warnings have a non-zero rate of false positives (as do many
> front-end warnings) and there are mechanisms to avoid them.  Compared to
> some of the other false positives we have, avoiding this one seems like a
> low priority to me.

Well is there a workaround ?
Or do you suggest using pragma ignore ?

Reply via email to