https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95012

            Bug ID: 95012
           Summary: [mingw/gcc10.1] mmapio.c:69:14: error: implicit
                    declaration of function ‘getpagesize’
           Product: gcc
           Version: 10.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libbacktrace
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: xantares09 at hotmail dot com
                CC: ian at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

when updating archlinux mingw-w64-gcc from 9.3.0 to 10.1.0
I noticed that libbacktrace fails to build because of an extra "-Werror"
present during the compilation of libbacktrace that was not here for previous
versions:

libtool: compile: 
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/build-i686-w64-mingw32/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/build-i686-w64-mingw32/./gcc/
-L/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib -L/usr/mingw/lib -isystem
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /usr/mingw/include
-B/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/bin/ -B/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/ -isystem
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/include -isystem /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-include
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace -I
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace/../include
-I
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace/../libgcc
-I ../libgcc -funwind-tables -frandom-seed=mmapio.lo -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wcast-qual -Werror -g -O2 -c
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace/mmapio.c
 -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/mmapio.o
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace/mmapio.c:
In function ‘backtrace_get_view’:
/home/xantares/projects/aur-scripts/mingw-w64-gcc/src/gcc/libbacktrace/mmapio.c:69:14:
error: implicit declaration of function ‘getpagesize’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Reply via email to