https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627

--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
> It is fixed for gcc 10, probably by
> g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194.

Yes, it's fixed with this commit.

Reply via email to