https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95063
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reduced testcase that is valid:
template <typename T>
struct S {
T a:12;
S () : a(0)
{
#pragma omp for linear(a)
for (int k = 0; k < 64; ++k)
a++;
}
};
S<int> s;
I guess this boils down to what type should the artificial
DECL_OMP_PRIVATIZED_MEMBER vars have for bit-fields, without it being a
template or without the bitfield type being a dependent type
omp_privatize_field would create the bitfield type, which is I think right, the
artificial var just stands for the COMPONENT_REF of this->bit_field (just will
have to check what exactly we do during expansion with that).
