https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95111
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 Blocks| |54367 CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6) > > We (at least several of us) agree that this is a source of easy programming > errors - and I expect there to be some revisiting in c++23. That's a > considerable challenge in the face of a mutable lambda - maybe (thinking > aloud) needs something like Apple blocks, but with an automatic promotion of > the closure to a heap object if it escapes the creating scope. ...(Apple blocks support is bug 78352, for reference)... Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 [Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions