https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95230
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think the problem is:
1 & (1 << I) != 0
is not being transformed to I == 0 if I had the range of (0..31)
Once that happens, we could split the loop into I != 0 (1..31) and I == 0 cases
and the I != 0 case becomes empty. Etc.
