https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95329
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I believe this is a glibc bug rather than gcc. This is without optimizations
and the library function in libm is called in both cases and giving different
results based on whether it is -inf, nan(0x2cba7e) or -inf, nan(0x400000).
glibc has a different bug tracker though, so you need to file it there
(sourceware.org/bugzilla).
If you compile with -O2, you'll get -inf in both cases (in that case no library
call is done and it is folded by gcc).
