https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95418
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #6) > Thomas, > > Contrary to my other libgfortran contribution, I was under the impression > that the patch touches only deep architectural details of the x87 chip, and > should be (and in fact is) independent of libgfortran implementation. Well, that's what https://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/ states - please copy us in in the future. It makes more sense to have a simpler rule than to make exceptions for specific subdirectories. (You can, of course, also commit a change as "obvious and simple", but we'd also appreciate a note about this).
