https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95685
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I wonder why CSE2 (after loop) does not catch the redundancies at least. Hmm, guess EBB is too local? But then there's gcse2?
- [Bug tree-optimization/95685] New: Loop invaria... bina2374 at gmail dot com
- [Bug tree-optimization/95685] Loop invaria... wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug tree-optimization/95685] Loop invaria... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
- [Bug rtl-optimization/95685] Loop invarian... rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
