https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96081
--- Comment #4 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- Turns out I was wrong here, and the re-ordering was done even by older than gcc 9. The move from 9.2 to 9.3 also included a move to a newer gas, which made the issue noticable. Feel free to close as invalid. I'm sorry for the noise.
