https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457
--- Comment #2 from Alex Coplan <acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the similar testcase:
long a;
short b;
signed char c(char d, char e) { return d + e; }
int main(void) {
a = -30;
for (; a < 24; a = c(a, 5)) {
short *f = &b;
(*f)--;
}
if (b != -11)
__builtin_abort();
}
we fail to assemble it after r10-4752. This is fixed by
r10-5304-g30f8bf3d6c072a8fce14e8a003dff485a9068a97, but we have wrong code
thereafter.
