https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #20) > > > >Is this your preferred solution? > > The backen should use more lowlevel functions to build this type rather than > copying from a type that isn't appropriate. Off my head it wants > fixup_unsigned_type after setting the mode and eventually a different > function to build the original type. See tree.c where we build for example > boolean_type_node > If thast the case, then I leave the construction/decision of how to build this backend type more properly to a PowerPC person that knows what they are doing. At least it should be straightforward for someone now.
