https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92294
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2020-Februar
| |y/539763.html
--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
Oops, I never linked the patch, it's:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-February/539763.html
(following on from an earlier discussion in January).
Reading the thread back now, the reception wasn't as negative
as I'd remembered. I'd been vaguely hoping to find time to try
removing find_base_term & co. for GCC 11, but that obviously
never happened. (Turns out that writing new code is more fun. ;-))
Maybe we could consider going for the linked patch for GCC 11.
