https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98022

--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The example that you give shows that setting the undefined part to zero
certainly is not correct. I updated my tree for the commit and am only just now
rebuilding. It'll be tomorrow before I put this right.

I guess that this is in the category of invalid but not forbidden. It's in the
same category as:
  complex :: a, b
  a%im = 1.0
  b = a
  print *, a, b
end

Thanks

Paul

Reply via email to