https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475
Daniel Marjamäki <daniel.marjamaki at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.marjamaki at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #62 from Daniel Marjamäki <daniel.marjamaki at gmail dot com> ---
> I think using run-time warnings will miss a lot of bugs, compared to compile
> time warnings.
I fully agree. This current situation is just dangerous.
In my humble opinion, the optimisations should be disabled until proper
warnings are written.
It is no silver bullet but to give a little confidence in your code you can
currently use Cppcheck. Cppcheck writes a warning with id
invalidTestForOverflow for `int + 100 > int`.
