https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98555
Ivan Sorokin <vanyacpp at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |vanyacpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from Ivan Sorokin <vanyacpp at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> [for QOI/security/whatever we probably want to at least emit a ret
> instruction]
RET might be dangerous when the return type is non-void. Perhaps UD2 or INT3
would be better?
