https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98555
Ivan Sorokin <vanyacpp at gmail dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vanyacpp at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Ivan Sorokin <vanyacpp at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > [for QOI/security/whatever we probably want to at least emit a ret > instruction] RET might be dangerous when the return type is non-void. Perhaps UD2 or INT3 would be better?