https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98605
--- Comment #6 from Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov at gmail dot com> --- What clang-tidy version? From the date of the commit, it was probably no older than 6, probably 4 or 5. If that is too old and probably considered unsupported, I think that is fine. But even if in the end it was a false positive, the warning seemed to me to be of high quality, ie to some standard of coding practice, it would be advised to document this somewhat subtle assumption. Not sure that applies to libstdc++ standards :) But if you cannot reproduce the original warning anyway, then I guess it's better to just remove it than make some change that can't even be tested.
