https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95021
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #13) > The failures reported in Comment 11 still exist on master, though. > Maybe it's too early to remove 11 from the regression list? But that seems to be a new issue with the added testcases. Can you open a separate PR for this?
