https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98612
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7) > I asked my colleagues within intel to revise the descriptions in the > intrinsics guide to make it more explicit about NAN operands. > > I'll fix this issue after the update of intrinsics guide. BTW: To get NaN semantics, one can always use relational operation instead of a builtin, so I'd say that builtin should correspond to a naked instruction (so, in the way GCC does).
