https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > That change included an important bugfix for the simd handling of > addressable locals, when they escape they would be then mishandled during > vectorization. > I think the current representation is right, represent them as if each simd > lane has its own copy of the variable. > The reason why this isn't vectorized is I think PR91020, that SRA doesn't > split those real and imag parts as separate (simd array) vars. Hmm, it's a bit far-fetched to consider this an SRA issue - can't OMP lowering do any better here?