https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |REOPENED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6) > (In reply to anlauf from comment #5) > > With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR. > [...] > > z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master. > > > Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase? > > It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. Only > glancing at the GCC 9 log files: > > I think the patch > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 96100 > and PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing. The patch for PRs 96100/101 was backported to 9-branch on 28th December. Both testcases run fine with 9-branch now. They even give the intended result :-) Before closing, I will add a testcase to master. I have taken the PR and reopened it. Cheers Paul