https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The slightly better code (i.e. just one load + permutation + store) started with r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af.
jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Fri, 12 Feb 2021 05:53:52 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The slightly better code (i.e. just one load + permutation + store) started with r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af.