https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96166

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The slightly better code (i.e. just one load + permutation + store) started
with
r11-6649-g285fa338b06b804e72997c4d876ecf08a9c083af.

Reply via email to