[Bug target/99083] Big run-time regressions of 519.lbm_r with LTO

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99083

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Btw, for GCC 11 it might be tempting to simply revert the "no-op" change?

There are a lot of targets that define REG_ALLOC_ORDER ^ HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER
and thus are affected by this change...