https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99090
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yes we could have partial uleb128 support. There is only a problem if at least one label is in the code section. There is another proposed solution to add special relaxable relocations for uleb128 but the initial proposal had flaws, and no one has reviewed the second proposal yet. Or we could change the -gsplit-dwarf support to work even when there is no uleb128 support.
