https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99299
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #5) > For the naming I suggest __builtin_debugtrap() to align with clang. Maybe > with an aliased __debugbreak() on Windows platforms. Those are terrible names. This would *not* be used more often than __builtin_trap, for debugging. In general, builtins should say what they *do*, nott what you imagine they will be used for.
