https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99421
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Note that one can theoretically reduce also the .gcda file. I have an > experimental pass for it in C-Vise and I will likely upstream it. I've just added that here: https://github.com/marxin/cvise/commit/ee714eeaa18f617d288dfee676d3f911a8edc2c8 with the commit, one can reduce the GCDA file: $ ./cvise.py -n1 --pass-group=binary -c 'cp ~/Programming/gcc2/objdir/gcc/predict.i . && /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B /home/marxin/Programming/gcc2/objdir/gcc/ -fprofile-use -fselective-scheduling -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -g -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -c predict.i 2>&1 | grep code_motion_process_successors' predict.gcda ... 00:00:00 INFO running 1 interestingness test in parallel 00:00:00 INFO INITIAL PASSES 00:00:00 INFO ===< GCDABinaryPass::None >=== 00:00:00 INFO (30.0%, 8148 bytes) 00:00:01 INFO (63.9%, 4200 bytes) 00:00:01 INFO (71.0%, 3372 bytes) 00:00:02 INFO (89.8%, 1184 bytes) 00:00:02 INFO (92.2%, 904 bytes) 00:00:03 INFO (92.9%, 828 bytes) 00:00:03 INFO (96.1%, 448 bytes) 00:00:03 INFO MAIN PASSES 00:00:03 INFO Termination check: size was 448; now 448 00:00:03 INFO CLEANUP PASSES 00:00:03 INFO ===================== done ==================== ===< PASS statistics >=== pass name time (s) time (%) worked failed total executed GCDABinaryPass::None 3.36 92.65 7 12 20 Runtime: 4 seconds
