https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #22 from Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Could you check the patch on the failed bootstraps. I have no access to Unfortunately, it didn't help. I continue to revert the patches for PRs 99378, 99422, and 99454 locally for now. > solaris machines. Technically, you have ;-) There's gcc211 in the cfarm, but unfortunately the installation is highly nonstandard, doesn't follow cfarm conventions, and lacks GNAT. While I do have a local gcc installation on the box without these issues, I agree it would be quite tedious to use. I suspect that the same issue occurs on Linux/sparc64, too (gcc202), but trying that on a machine that's pretty unreliable wouldn't be my idea of fun.
