https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99604

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #4)
> I wonder if this was an instance of 99423?

It doesn't use any modules, so unlikely.  I thought of PR99447 instead but
since it doesn't reproduce...

Reply via email to