https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100057
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #26)
> yes. i tried that first and Then report a bug here. whats wrong with it?
> wasn't bugzilla designed for the stuff here? you asked me not to put you in
> the CC list and i did. Whats the complain here?
That "There is no freestanding in C++" and "I'm perfectly correct" are not bug
reports, and "It is such a joke." doesn't persuade anybody to try and help you.
>
> 1. i do build things with newlib and i know It works. However It was
> actually you who said newlib is not standard compliant etc.
In what context?
I might have said some part of newlib is not conforming, but that's true for
most software.
> 2. i am not the first person who tried that. i believe a lot of people tried
> that before and they failed. That is why newlib is very popular. However It
> still does not change the fact using C++ to write OS kernel stuffs are
> fruastrating.
Sure. But "it's frustrating" is too vague to do anything about.
If you want to make it less frustrating, report specific, detailed bug reports.
"It is such a joke" is not helpful and gets your bugs closed.
> 4. When people build stuffs with newlib they usually do not disable
> libstdcxx verbose which leads to at least 60kb of Binary bloat of binutils
> (c++filt)+the dependency of stdio which make exception handling much hard to
> use
It's not a gcc bug if people don't use the existing options that would help
them.
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #27)
> How to commit code to gcc? what's the permission requirement?
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
