[Bug middle-end/88175] GCC should not warn within implicit copy-constructor (or should report the implicit function in a special way)

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88175

--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Why is that needed? It says the location is something like:

In member function ‘info& info::operator=(const info&)’,

or:

In copy constructor ‘info::info(const info&)’,

If that isn't explicitly defined in the class, then obviously it's being
defined implicitly by the compiler. That property of C++ should not surprise
anybody.