https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100233

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to gcc-bugs from comment #0)
> https://eel.is/c++draft/range.elements#iterator-3
> 
> With some good-will you could say that `get` should be called unqualified :)

Nope, that call is required to be std::get.

https://eel.is/c++draft/contents#3

The standard does not support user-defined tuple types that have a get overload
in their own namespace.
  • [Bug libstdc++/100... gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de via Gcc-bugs
    • [Bug libstdc+... redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to