https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100443
--- Comment #5 from gnzlbg <gonzalo.gadeschi at gmail dot com> --- > There is still no mention of signatures, which is why I wondered why you're > talking about them. Re-reading that part, you are correct that it does not mention signatures. I misunderstood it. Reading [basic.scope.scope], i'm not sure if `A::f` "corresponds to" `B::f`. Does it?