https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100443

--- Comment #5 from gnzlbg <gonzalo.gadeschi at gmail dot com> ---
> There is still no mention of signatures, which is why I wondered why you're 
> talking about them.

Re-reading that part, you are correct that it does not mention signatures. I
misunderstood it.

Reading [basic.scope.scope], i'm not sure if `A::f` "corresponds to" `B::f`.
Does it?

Reply via email to