https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100452
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2021-05-07
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, I'm not sure if it works, but at least the FE accepts it. Does
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr99971.cc
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr99971.cc
index bec6418d4e8..cf22b3331d2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr99971.cc
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr99971.cc
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct A
d -= that.d;
return *this;
}
-};
+} __attribute__((aligned(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__)));
void test(A& x, A const& y1, A const& y2)
{
fix it on sparc? At least on x86 the A arguments in test now then have
user-alignment of 128 ...
Can you test that on sparc? Feel free to install as well.
