https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100407
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #2)
> I got it to fail on the gcc110 gcc farm machine.
>
> g:659cc7d6320aae7ab390b5886f0efed22f78e244, r12-1164
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
> compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O0 scan-assembler
> .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O1 scan-assembler
> .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O2 scan-assembler
> .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O3 -g scan-assembler
> .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -Os scan-assembler
> .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O2 -flto
> -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none scan-assembler .rodata.*,"aR"
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-retain-1.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> -fno-fat-lto-objects scan-assembler .rodata.*,"aR"
> # of expected passes 35
> # of unexpected failures 7
>
> I did have to use my own binutils (2.36.1) or the test came up as
> unsupported.
Does it fail on LE?
