https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101419 > > --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > > Note usually we still run all property providers but the way you set > > the property outside of pass->properties_provided breaks this. Thus > > maybe split objsz into two separate passes rather than using the > > flag so you can use properties_provided. > > I wanted to avoid having two separate passes, but if you prefer it, it can be > done. Will be a user visible change in the dumps and for -fdisable-tree-* > etc. > (though we do such changes all the time). Yes, I think it's needed for GIMPLE FE testcase correctness. As for dumpfile renaming, yeah - that's unfortunate. I'm always hoping somebody bites the bullet and implements NEXT_PASS (pass_late_object_size, "objsz2") aka specifying the dump suffix explicitely.
