https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71690
Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
Not sure how to create a test case for this that isn't super dependent on
debugging output formatting.
regardless, the correct ranges are available if you are using ranger, so I will
close this PR as "use ranger in your pass" :-)
details here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-June/236363.html
it boils down to replacing your get_range_info calls (or SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO or
whatever is being used) with get_range_query ()->range_of_expr ()
