https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101585
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Bad interaction of |[11/12 Regression] Bad
|-fsanitize=undefined and |interaction of
|-Wvla-parameters |-fsanitize=undefined and
| |-Wvla-parameters
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail| |11.1.0, 12.0
Keywords| |diagnostic
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2021-07-23
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. It looks like an oversight in r12-2329. The following fixes it:
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.c b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.c
index 552a29f9944..7a50baedea9 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-warn.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-warn.c
@@ -3275,7 +3275,8 @@ warn_parm_ptrarray_mismatch (location_t origloc, tree
curparms, tree newparms)
/* Move on if the bounds look the same. */
if (!pcurbndpos && !pnewbndpos
&& curbnd && newbnd
- && operand_equal_p (curbnd, newbnd, OEP_LEXICOGRAPHIC))
+ && operand_equal_p (curbnd, newbnd, OEP_LEXICOGRAPHIC
+ | OEP_DECL_NAME))
continue;
if ((curbnd && TREE_CODE (curbnd) != INTEGER_CST)
