https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562

--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8408d34570c9fe9f3d22a25a76df2a4c64f08477

commit r12-2499-g8408d34570c9fe9f3d22a25a76df2a4c64f08477
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 23 19:55:16 2021 +0200

    expmed: Fix store_integral_bit_field [PR101562]

    Our documentation says that paradoxical subregs shouldn't appear
    in strict_low_part:
    '(strict_low_part (subreg:M (reg:N R) 0))'
         This expression code is used in only one context: as the
         destination operand of a 'set' expression.  In addition, the
         operand of this expression must be a non-paradoxical 'subreg'
         expression.
    but on the testcase below that triggers UB at runtime
    store_integral_bit_field emits exactly that.

    The following patch fixes it by ensuring the requirement is satisfied.

    2021-07-23  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

            PR rtl-optimization/101562
            * expmed.c (store_integral_bit_field): Only use movstrict_optab
            if the operand isn't paradoxical.

            * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr101562.c: New test.

Reply via email to