https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|FIXED                       |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Probably fixed by either:

    Implement P0522R0, matching of template template arguments.

    gcc/c-family/
            * c.opt (-fnew-ttp-matching): New flag.
            * c-opts.c (c_common_post_options): Default on if -std=c++1z.
    gcc/cp/
            * pt.c (coerce_template_template_parms): Allow a template argument
            that's less specialized than the parameter.
            (unify_bound_ttp_args): Adjust parm's args to apply to arg's
            template.
            (coerce_template_args_for_ttp): Split out from
            lookup_template_class_1.
            (coerce_ttp_args_for_tta, store_defaulted_ttp)
            (lookup_defaulted_ttp, add_defaults_to_ttp): New.
            (process_partial_specialization): Set DECL_CONTEXT of
            template template-parameters.
            (coerce_template_parms): Only inform when complain.
            (expand_template_argument_pack): Handle error_mark_node.
            (convert_template_argument, template_args_equal, unify): Handle
            any_targ_node.
            * cp-tree.h (enum cp_tree_index): Add CPTI_ANY_TARG.
            (any_targ_node): New.
            * decl.c (cxx_init_decl_processing): Set it.
            * name-lookup.c (consider_binding_level): Ignore names with
embedded
            spaces.

    From-SVN: r243871

or:

    PR c++/42329 - deducing base template for template template arg

            * pt.c (unify_bound_ttp_args): Split out from unify.
            (try_class_unification): Handle BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM.
            (unify): Check for type/non-type mismatch early.
            [BOUND_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM]: Try get_template_base.

    From-SVN: r243870


I think it's the latter, and this is a dup of PR 42329.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42329 ***

Reply via email to