[Bug c++/87208] dependent name resolution selects a function it should have NEVER considered

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87208

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Dup of PR 51577 ?

Well it does seem fixed on the trunk and that PR is fixed on the trunk (though
not closed).