https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102268
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed.
+Deleted redundant store p3_9(D)->v2.x = t2$x_25;
+Deleted redundant store p3_9(D)->v1.x = t1$x_2;
@@ -227,12 +157,8 @@
<bb 3> :
temp_10 = p3_9(D)->v1.x;
- t2$x_25 = temp_10;
- p3_9(D)->v2.x = t2$x_25;
MEM[(struct s2 *)p2_13(D)].x = 1234;
temp_15 = p3_9(D)->v2.x;
- t1$x_2 = temp_15;
- p3_9(D)->v1.x = t1$x_2;
<bb 4> :
_23 = MEM[(struct s1 *)p1_6(D)].x;
that leaves us with the store via S2 that is not found when looking up the
load via S1 but instead we find the originally loaded value.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101641 ***
