https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102317

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > -fno-strict-overflow maps directly to -fwrapv .
> > 
> > If you want to use -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow, you can just remove
> > both -fno-strict-overflow -fwrapv.  -fwrapv is implied for code later on.
> 
> is it possible to make -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow work with -fwrapv?

Why would it? they conflict.

Reply via email to