https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> So instead of doing *((T[0:] *)&a[ubound])[-idx] for accesses do
> a[ubound - idx]?
I think this assumption is correct.
Of course 'a' could have a non-trivial stride (i.e. being /= 1), which is
provided by the array descriptor. That should hopefully been respected by
the suggested change.
